
Neil Brand (piano) and Günter Buchwald (violin) playing to Wedding At Belmont Free Church, a home movie of a Sutton wedding party, 24 October 1931, part of the ‘London Loves’ programme of archive film shown in Trafalgar Square, 24 October 2008.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Related
Lovely shot…..I hope the weather was kinder to the films and the audience than the day before, where we (I would guess a good 500) endured rain and high wind for High Treason….was there a good turnout for the London films ?? Incidentally, a low-fi clip of Living London has been placed on the website of The Torygraph….
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/3248605/Lost-film-footage-of-Edwardian-London-discovered.html
The High Treason screening was somewhat marred by rain, so it was remarkable that so many turned as did as stuck with it. The inflatable screen waved to and fro in the wind, which did some amusing things to the screened image. London Loves enjoyed better weather, and the Square was packed. Very successful show, with Neil Brand, Gunter Buchwald on violin, and a drummer whose name I forget, sorry.
Living London was given the big build up and was the big hit, but… it isn’t Living London. Detectives are still on the case, but it seems that what we’ve actually got are two parts of the four part The Streets of London (yes, I know, Ralph McTell and all that), from 1906. It’s still a Charles Urban film, it’s still a rediscovery, and still a dazzling piece of work, but two years later than was thought. More on this in due course – I only learned of the doubts about its identity yesterday (just as the papers picked up on it and it was anounced to the audience in London…), and I checked the Urban 1906 catalogue afterwards. Sure enough, it matches the catalogue description shot for shot. Heigh ho.
Thanks also for the film link – extracts from different parts of the film. Glad someone’s published it.
There are further clips from the film in a Sky News report included with this Times report:
http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/film/london_film_festival/article5004221.ece
The report features an interview with Ian Christie, who found the film, and who speaks most eloquently on its documentary qualities.
If you can check newspaper archives for when Marie Lloyd was headlining at The Oxford, that may clinch it – there was a very visible poster in one shot…
I didn’t spot that – I’ll alert those who have access to a complete copy (I don’t) and tell them to look for it. Do you recall what part of the film it was in?
However, it’s certain that the film is The Streets of London, even if (as is perfectly possible, knowing Urban’s habits) it may have re-used film from the earlier series. Here are the 1906 Urban catalogue descriptions of parts 1 and 4 of the film:
As you will recognise, they agree with the film we have, shot for shot.
The poster was on a building-end poster site a fair way down on the left, of one of the shots looking down a traffic-filled road. It might only really be spottable on a big screen…I made a note of it at the Verdi.
Thanks for the shot list….the film originally began with the old dear asleep on the park bench ???!!!! Good grief….I assumed it was a part-way through, a second or third reel…that must have been pretty shocking at the time, or am I being naive??
I thought it was a shot from mid-reel myself, but it really seems that – aside from a missing opening title (presumably there was one) – the film opened with an elderly woman sleeping on a bench. I doubt that there were any other shots indicating London waking. It would have been an obvious enough concept for the city films of two decades later, but for 1906, there was nothing like it. Would it have shocked at the time? I’m not sure. I think people would have taken it in their stride. But how will we ever know?
For the record, this the Urban catalogue description of parts 2 and 3 of the film, the missing sections.
Good as what we have is, I would so like to see those Whitechapel sequences and the street traders. They really did set out to film the city in all its colours. And what about that sequence where they cut from the King and Queen in their pomp to the old flower woman? Radical stuff from Charlie Urban. Time to start scouring the Australian film archives…
Indeed…we can but hope….